|
|
Faint
Praise: The Plight of Book Reviewing in America by Gail Pool University of
Missouri Press Summer 2007 Available as an ebook on Amazon Kindle and Smashwords |
This article, under the
title “Defensive Reading,” appeared in the travel section of the
New York Times on Sunday, October 25,
1998.
Not long
ago, in search of a book to accompany a trying journey, I took from my shelves a
volume that had served me well before: “A Sportsman’s Notebook,” by Turgenev,
its pages still redolent of jungle rot, its stories evoking the hardest journey
of my life.
It was
nearly 30 years back that I spent 18 months in the bush doing fieldwork with my
husband, an anthropology student at the time.
We had been guided to the Territory of Papua and New Guinea by my
husband’s tutor, who had himself done fieldwork in the region. But it was our own young perversity that had
led us astray.
When we
first considered visiting the Baining people on the island of New Britain, we
had certainly been warned: the terrain would be difficult, mountainous and
rugged, hard to reach in the dry season, impossible to leave when rivers
flooded in the rains. Breaks would be
hard to come by, tensions between us would run high, and the Baining, rumor had
it, were neither pleasant nor friendly.
Mysteriously,
three prospective field trips to this tribe had been canceled: one, 40 years
earlier, had failed.
We
laughed, thrilled by the challenge: it sounded ideal.
Our trip
was such a fiasco that I’m sure we would have seen it as a comedy had we not
been so young and so unhappy. My
husband’s thesis topic was “The Ritual Expression of Opposition Between the
Sexes.” But the only opposition between
the sexes in our village was the fighting that erupted from our hut; our
arguments—ritually repeated daily—must surely have intrigued the Baining. I myself, a former classics major, had hoped
to gather myths. But their own myths, I
discovered, were not terribly important to the Baining, who did, however, ask
me about mine.
As for
the Baining themselves, the rumors were wrong.
They were extremely friendly—though you would never call them pleasant:
they were too individually eccentric for a word so bland. They certainly welcomed us in their laconic
way, took us under their wing—two more children—and saw that we were fed: they
brought us taro, bananas, coconuts, and even, once, larvae, for a treat.
But they
were, it turned out, a private people.
They seldom asked each other questions more personal than, “Where are
you going?” And they often seemed
reluctant to tell each other even that.
They no more welcomed queries about their sex lives than I would. After several months, I told my husband that
for fieldwork, he was on his own.
Why I
didn’t leave at the point is one of the mysteries that will forever shroud our
curious sojourn. Tenacity? Duty?
Bravado? Without doubt,
competition was involved. We each, my
husband and I, felt we had to see the trip through. It was the weaker man who would leave.
But from
then on, though I maintained my simple bush life—mainly gathering firewood and
cooking taro—when I visited the villagers, I neither prodded nor probed. And when I stayed in my hut, I would
read—fervently, avidly, intensely: in books I found alternative worlds.
I began
collecting books in Rabaul, an enjoyably seedy town, on one of our hardwon
breaks. I strolled down Mango Avenue to
the news agent, where I picked up what I could: some Penguins (I recall E. M.
Forster’s “Room With a View”) and a ghastly little anthology of horror that I
remember reading with surprising affection—I found comfort, I suspect, in those
tales of people boiled and flayed; they were surely worse off than I.
I asked
my mother to send books and her cartons made their way around the world: flying
to Rabaul, taking a freight boat to the nearest coastal plantation, and riding
on a Baining’s back as he returned home from some adventure of his own. The title that stands out from her supply is
“Portnoy’s Complaint” by Philip Roth, which was not the best of the lot, God
knows, but seemed the oddest to be reading in the bush.
But none
of this was enough for the hours in my jungle day. At length, I discovered an Australian
bookstore offering literary succor to the outback: they had everything, they
mailed anywhere, and I began to read in earnest.
I worked
my way steadily through the novels of Thomas Hardy, whose hard view of the
world was just what I needed. I delved
into the essays of Randall Jarrell, whose witty intelligence I needed no
less. I jogged through Jaroslav Hasek’s
“Good Soldier Schweik,” whose humor I obviously needed. And I drank in “A Sportsman’s Notebook,”
whose humanity I needed perhaps most of all.
What the
Baining made of all this reading, I have no idea. How could I have asked? How could they? Only the children seemed curious, gathering
around my hut to observe me in my utter stillness. Once, to my shame, I felt so vexed by their
eyes that I let loose with a tirade: Why
were they crouching by my doorstep? What
were they doing? Fortunately, my
Baining, poor at best, grew so garbled in my rage that whatever I said
apparently had no meaning at all.
Affable as ever, the children smiled and didn’t budge.
For my
husband, my withdrawal clearly brought relief, freeing him to find his own way
through the bush. He turned, in time, to
work, a final push to salvage what he could.
In fact, when we left the field, he would leave the field of anthropology
as well: the coda to our jungle fugue.
But he didn’t know that yet. He
carried on, immersing himself in the finale: preparations for the spear dance
that would mark the climax of our field trip and its long-awaited end.
We packed
at last, surrounded by villagers lamenting our departure and shyly eyeing our
goods. There wasn’t much—we had lived
very sparely—but most of it would have to stay: the road to the coast was long. We took so little that we found, back home,
we had almost nothing to remind us of New Guinea, an absence of mementos that
no doubt has served our marriage well.
But that
volume of Turgenev is almost all I have of my jungle library, and I’ve always
regretted having to leave those books behind.
I’m sure though that the Baining put them to use. I’ve often pictured Baiki and Kyimkyim,
Taingan and Suga carefully dividing up the books, neatly tearing out the pages,
deftly rolling each around a leaf of their aromatic tobacco, and smoking them,
with pleasure, line by line.